Recently, celebrity memes have swept the crypto community again, from JENNER released by Kardashian's transgender stepfather Caitlyn Jenner to MOTHER released by female rapper Iggy Azalea. The hundreds of times increase has brought the craze of meme coins to a new level.
Related reading: 《From JENNER to MOTHER, are celebrity coins the new favorite or the new pit in crypto? 》
On May 29, the day when MOTHER went online, according to Lookonchain monitoring, in just 5 hours, a trader spent 5.14 SOL to buy 86.55 million MOTHERs, and the current profit is 762 times. Although it was once in a zero state, according to birdeye data, as of the time of writing, the price of MOTHER reached $0.144, an increase of more than 2,700 times according to the opening.
Such a crazy scene eventually angered Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin. On June 5, Vitalik said on the social media platform that so far, I am very dissatisfied with "this round of celebrity experiments"," and even attached a "vomiting" expression in the tweet.
After Caitlyn Jenner, Sahil Arora found Iggy Azalea.
Related reading: "Vitalik talks about meme again: what is the imagination space for meme coins? "
But for this round of celebrity memes, Vitalik is dissatisfied with their strong financialization attributes, and he uses Stoner Cats to satirize celebrity memes in 2024.
Stoner Cats is a collectible NFT minting project to support Hollywood actress Mila Kunis and her friends in making an animated short film, in which Vitalik once voiced a cat character.
Vitalik is optimistic about Stoner Cats because it has a purpose other than financialization. To sum it up in his own words, it has some kind of public welfare goal, some kind of interesting mechanism, and can do something that lasts for more than 10 years, rather than bubbling for a few months and then being forgotten.
The public welfare goal means that its purpose is not to enrich celebrities and early adopters, but should be art projects, or celebrities' favorite charities. And the interesting mechanism is not just trading tokens, such as token voting DAO at least provides people with "something" to do and organize. DAO should not completely determine the agenda, but it can have some influence.
Placeholder partner Chris Burniske said, "If MOTHER breaks into sustainable value creation, it will also become the mother of celebrity experiments in this cycle."
It was this comment that triggered Vitalik's "Declaration of Dissatisfaction", and many community members also joined the discussion. On the one hand, those who agreed with Vitalik began to promote projects built for non-financial purposes such as charity. They are either investors in the project or founders of the project.
On the other hand, the voices against Vitalik said, "Isn't the whole meaning of celebrity meme nonsense?" Some people also bluntly stated that Vitalik was dissatisfied because Ethereum had low transaction volume, while Solana brought huge liquidity because of various memes.
And Iggy arrogantly said "he's just hungry". Uniswap founder Hayden has a positive attitude towards celebrity memes. He believes that there is no problem with meme coins or celebrity coins and they are worthy of attention. Because the fundamental purpose and value of the technology go far beyond financial games. The best builders in this field are motivated by positive social change.
But he said, "Iggy could have responded positively and donated the profits to social causes or something else. Instead, she condescended to treat the best builders in the entire space, proving his point."
In order to refute Vitalik, community members said that celebrity memes would change the social structure. Among them, @Abbasshaikh42 said, "You only see what CT wants you to see. Financialization is not the final product. Many celebrities or creators may eventually notice these moments of financial depravity and use cryptocurrency to do more."
According to Iggy, she has donated the funds from this project to a charity that saves koalas from chlamydia. Moreover, Iggy seems to have more plans.
If the proceeds of MOTHER are indeed used for charitable projects, then this seems to fit Vitalik's definition of a "good meme". But this also points out a key contradiction. The so-called "good meme" is actually difficult to be exposed and hyped, while the celebrity effect can attract more attention from people in the industry and thus be hyped and fermented.
As @CaesarsCalls said, "I've been working hard, but it's hard when people like you are so quiet and uninvolved." At the same time, he said, "If you really care, you will investigate the issue, look at other good leaders, and start preaching the right things." @CryptonianNuke also believes that "powerful thinkers and leaders are busy developing and ignoring who has become influential in this field."
Of course, Vitalik's concerns are not unreasonable. According to past experience, celebrity memes, like celebrity NFTs, end up returning to zero or rug. At present, celebrity meme coins often distort the market more than they contribute.
But currently observing the performance of MOTHER, on June 5, Bitget announced the launch of MOTHER IGGY (MOTHER), and MOTHER continues to be the focus of speculation. As of the time of writing, the price of the coin is still rising, and today it ranks in the top three of the real-time increase list.
Welcome to join the official BlockBeats community:
Telegram Subscription Group: https://t.me/theblockbeats
Telegram Discussion Group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App
Official Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia