This article was posted by a community member. The author is David Tarditi, Vice President of Engineering at CertiK, a Web3 smart contract auditing company.
Abstract
Formal verification of smart contracts can Protect them from bugs, bugs, and other disadvantages. In this process, human experts convert the smart contract's logic into mathematical statements, and then use an automated process to check the actual logic against a model of the contract's expected behavior. Combining formal verification and manual auditing, we can conduct a comprehensive assessment of the security of smart contracts.
Smart contracts are computer programs deployed on the blockchain , which will run automatically when certain conditions are met. Smart contracts can be very simple or extremely complex and can hold assets worth millions or even billions of dollars.
If there are security holes in the smart contract code, it may have devastating consequences, such as the theft of all the assets held by criminals. . In 2021, $50 million was stolen from automated market maker (AMM) Uranium Finance due to a typo in a smart contract.
Also in 2021, Compound Finance mistakenly issued $80 million in rewards due to a single coding error. In 2022, $320 million was stolen from Wormhole Bridge due to an error in the smart contract.
Therefore, it is important to get the smart contract program right from the beginning. Smart contracts adopt an open source model, which means that once the contract is deployed, the code is made public. If a hacker discovers a bug, they can immediately exploit it. Additionally, the normal practice of patching security vulnerabilities over time is ineffective because the code of smart contracts often cannot be modified after deployment.
Formal verification of smart contracts is achieved by presenting the logic and expected behavior of the smart contract as mathematical statements. Auditors then use automated tools to check whether these statements are correct.
The process involves:
Use formal language to define the specifications and expected characteristics of the contract.
Convert the code of the contract into a formal statement, such as a mathematical model or logic.
Use automated theorem proving or model checking to verify contract specifications and properties.
Repeat the validation process to find and fix any errors or deviations from expected characteristics.
By applying mathematical reasoning, it helps ensure that formally verified smart contracts avoid errors, loopholes, and other adverse situations. Verification also helps increase trust and confidence in the contract because its properties have been rigorously tested and are correct and reliable.
These examples below outline how smart contract verification can help prevent significant financial losses and other catastrophic consequences.
Uniswap It is a well-known AMM. Uniswap V1 smart contract underwent formal verification during the development process. Prior to release, this formal verification found and fixed some rounding errors, preventing Uniswap V1 from being drained of funds.
Balancer V2 is also a proven AMM. Formal verification discovered and fixed a fee calculation error in the flash loan feature in the smart contract that left the trading platform vulnerable to theft.
SafeMoon V1 after deployment , an extremely small error was discovered through formal verification. If the error is not discovered, if the contract owner performs certain operations before giving up ownership, the contract owner may regain the contract after giving up.
Most manual audits of the SafeMoon V1 fork miss this error because specific combinations of program variable values need to be analyzed to Found this error. Humans can easily miss this problem, but machines can catch it in time.
Formal Verification provides a systematic, automated way to check the logic and behavior of a contract against its expected characteristics. This makes it easier to identify and fix any potential bugs or vulnerabilities. This is particularly useful for complex, subtle issues that would be difficult to detect through manual inspection.
Manual auditing includes experts reviewing the code, design and deployment of the contract. Auditors use their experience and expertise to identify security risks and assess the overall security posture of the contract. They can also confirm that the formal verification process was performed correctly and check for any issues that automated tools might not detect.
Combining formal verification and manual auditing, we can conduct a comprehensive assessment of the security of smart contracts. This improves the odds of finding and fixing any vulnerabilities. In doing so, we are adopting a defense-in-depth security approach that combines the expertise of humans and machines.
In order to ensure the security of smart contracts, formal verification and manual auditing must be combined to ensure a comprehensive and thorough assessment of the security posture of smart contracts.
Although formal verification is more resource intensive, it is worthwhile for contracts with high value or high risk factors. invest. After all, at the end of the day, security is more important than anything else. Make sure to prioritize security and ensure that smart contracts are free from bugs, vulnerabilities, and adverse unexpected behaviors.
What is a smart contract ?
What is smart contract security audit?
Disclaimer and Risk Warning: strong>The contents of this article are factual and are for general information and educational purposes only and do not constitute any representation or warranty. This article should not be construed as financial advice and is not recommending that you purchase any specific product or service. Digital asset prices may fluctuate. The value of your investment may fall as well as rise and you may not get back the principal invested. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions and Binance Academy is not responsible for any losses you may suffer. This material does not constitute financial advice.